Hunter, Enrow, Dropcontact, the waterfalls: fine tools, most of them. The billing rule is where we differ. Below, their own public wording next to ours, dates attached.
No credit card required · 50 free credits
Hunter is a fine platform with an honest verifier, except on one point. Accept-all domains are verified with a proprietary method, then billed like any other verdict. We hold the credit until the proof exists.
Where Hunter wins: breadth. Sequences, a light CRM, integrations everywhere, a browser extension used by 600 000+ people, and a free plan that renews its 50 credits monthly. As an all-in-one outreach platform, Hunter plays a wider game than we do.
Bring your Hunter export. Columns come back intact, and re-verifying a list costs 0.1 credit per address: verdicts we can’t prove cost nothing.
Enrow says “No result, no charge”, prices its plans at 15 € and 75 €, and verifies catch-alls. On paper we are close. What separates us is what each of us can show you.
Where Enrow wins: phones. Verified mobile numbers and direct lines are half their product, and we don’t do phones at all. Call-first teams will find things there that Mozart doesn’t offer.
A claim is only worth the measurement behind it: read how ours are made.
Algorithmic, GDPR-first, no stored database: Dropcontact reasons about enrichment the way we do, and their benchmark culture is genuinely good. Two rules still separate us, and they are the two we care most about.
Where Dropcontact wins: the CRM. Native HubSpot and Pipedrive enrichment, duplicate merging, first-name and civility cleaning, SIREN and legal data on French companies. As a CRM-native cleaner it is ahead of us, and ahead of most.
FullEnrich, BetterContact and the category they lead chain 20 or more data vendors and keep the first answer that comes back. The find rate is real. So is the number of companies your prospect list visits on the way.
Where waterfalls win: coverage at any cost. When every row must be filled and mobile numbers matter, a 20-vendor cascade fills more rows than any single engine, ours included. That is the trade, and it should be made knowingly.
A catch-all domain accepts every address, so a surface check proves nothing. We run deeper signals on it and return the address only when it is highly probable. Below that bar we return not-found, the held credit goes back to your balance, and you pay 0. Others refund the bad result after you complain. With Mozart, it is simply never billed.
Every competitor quote on this page is their own public wording, retrieved July 29, 2026 from their sites. Products and prices change. If something here no longer matches what a competitor publishes, tell us and we will correct it.
Yes. Upload the CSV as is: your columns come back intact and in order. Re-verifying costs 0.1 credit per address, files run up to 5 000 rows, and any address we cannot prove is returned free.
Comparison based on public information retrieved July 29, 2026. Products change; if something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.